![]() |
| Freedom of Speech Not as bad as you think |
The omission of freedom of speech will soon catch up to bite hard in the end. Without freedom of speech, endeared by many, I predict war for the deprivation of this certain quality. For example, if we took away the freedom of speech of the LGBT community, you can bet that either unofficial/unlawful secret relationships will transpire or the people will riot near numerous government buildings until their rights are returned. We've seen the latter occur already, but what would it look like if every LGBT took up the cause? Scary. Freedom of speech is necessary so that awareness of hot topics or danger such as terrorists become known and people will know how to handle these situations in the most economically effective ways possible.
After the massacre, various news sites such as ABC and MSNBC reporting the attack have censored the Charlie Hebdo comics to avoid stirring up additional terrorist rage and future attacks. But terrorists will kill at any time for any reason. Censorship is a form of apology, and this may only slow down the attacks but never abolish them. In fact, this backing down will give strength to terrorist organizations. When a strong front or confident self-image is put up, the enemy will be less likely to attack. The entire world must never turn a blind eye to what others including pro-LGBTs, pro-abortionists, and most importantly gospel-proclaiming Christians etc. have to say and never quit stepping in and expending its resources such as money and soldiers in exchange for the protection of the world from all universal enemies that murder innocent people or violate the God-given rights of mankind.


There are some questions that need to be answered here. Is Charlie Hebdo's satire of Mohamed a freedom that should be protected by the state? To what extent should the freedom of religion protect any religion? How should Islam or Christianity respond to blaspheme or should it be protected by the state against blaspheme? Just some thoughts, remember seek to answer the hard question.
ReplyDeleteYeah. I tried really hard to answer the hard question here. This particular topic has so many pathways to it that it would take more than one week to cover all of its sub-topics such as the questions you raised. To me, there's no clear-sided answer.
Delete